168k views
1 vote
What is NOT a necessary concideration when determining if your sources are reliable?

Who wrote the source?
Who published the source?
Is the source form the library?
When was the source published?

User Rflw
by
8.6k points

2 Answers

1 vote
The consideration that is NOT necessary when determining if your sources are reliable is "Is the source from the library?"

While it can be beneficial to consult library resources, the fact that a source is from a library does not inherently make it more reliable or credible. The reliability of a source depends on various factors such as author expertise, publication credibility, accuracy of information, and relevance to the topic.

On the other hand, the other three considerations are important for evaluating the reliability of a source:

- Who wrote the source: Assessing the author's credentials, expertise, and reputation can help determine if they are qualified to write on the subject matter.

- Who published the source: Evaluating the reputation and credibility of the publisher or publication can provide insights into the source's reliability.

- When was the source published: Considering the publication date is important to ensure that the information is up-to-date and relevant to your research or inquiry. However, the importance of publication date can vary depending on the topic and context. Some subjects may require the most recent information, while others may benefit from historical perspectives.
User Dogan Askan
by
8.4k points
1 vote

Answer: When was the source published

Explanation: The upload date or time does not affect the credibility of the source

User Evan Langlois
by
7.7k points

No related questions found