Question

state-funded programs, based on the supreme court decision in lemon v. kurtzman, are unable to withstand scrutiny under the establishment clause if the program

Answer 1

State-funded programs, based on the Supreme Court decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman, cannot withstand scrutiny under the Establishment Clause if they do not pass the Lemon Test.

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the Supreme Court decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman, state-funded programs are unable to withstand scrutiny under the Establishment Clause if they fail to meet the three-part test known as the Lemon Test. According to the Lemon Test, for a law to be considered constitutional, it must have a legitimate secular purpose, must not have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion, and must not result in excessive government entanglement with religion.

Answer 2

State-funded programs, based on the Supreme Court decision in Lemon v. Kurtzman, are unable to withstand scrutiny under the Establishment Clause if the program has large and specific results in the popularization of a religion.

The requirements for a state-funded program to be constitutional are:

• The secular purpose.
• The main effect is neutral.
• Moderate involvement.

The Lemon V. Kurtzman decision highlights that state-funded programs must have a role in popularizing a religion to resist the Establishment Clause. This highlights that these programs must maintain secular purposes, without endorsing a specific religion, maintaining a religiously neutral nature.