Final answer:
The topic of human cloning presents a plethora of dimensions to consider, including ethical, legal, biological, personal beliefs, and the distinction between full human cloning and organ cloning. A ban in one nation doesn't restrict cloning from happening elsewhere. The view of cloning as a form of procreation is subjective.
Step-by-step explanation:
This set of questions seeks opinions and thoughts on the complex ethical, legal, and biological implications of human cloning. Whether one agrees with Cardinal O'Malley's view on human cloning can be influenced by many factors, including personal beliefs, ethics, and an understanding of the biological and medical implications of this technology. I would not provide my personal opinion as it is unprofessional.
Do note, the banning of human cloning, while possible in one nation, may not prevent the process from occurring elsewhere due to different legal and ethical considerations. This leads to a wider debate about global regulations and laws regarding cutting-edge sciences like cloning.
Some might argue that human cloning falls under the banner of human procreation, but this interpretation greatly depends on cultural, ethical, and personal beliefs. Finally, even those who oppose whole human cloning may not be against the cloning of organs, as this could significantly advance medical treatments and transplants for devastating conditions.
Learn more about Human Cloning