Answer:
If I were in charge of allocating funds for a levee system in a place like New Orleans, I would prioritize a very strong and expensive system to mitigate relatively rare storms like Katrina. Here's my rationale for this choice:
1. Protecting lives: The primary purpose of a levee system is to protect human lives and property from the devastation caused by storms. Investing in a strong system would ensure that residents have the highest level of protection during rare but powerful storms like Katrina. These storms can be catastrophic and result in loss of life and significant damage to infrastructure.
2. Long-term cost savings: While a very strong and expensive system may seem financially burdensome upfront, it can save money in the long run. A robust system can prevent or minimize the damage caused by powerful storms, reducing the need for costly repairs and reconstruction efforts. The economic losses associated with a major disaster like Katrina far exceed the cost of investing in a strong levee system.
3. Climate change considerations: As the frequency and intensity of storms are expected to increase due to climate change, it is crucial to prepare for future events. Investing in a strong system that can withstand powerful storms provides a level of resilience and adaptability to changing environmental conditions.
Regarding the potential backlash if it turned out that I made the "wrong" choice, such as building a larger system but no strong storms occur, or a smaller system that gets overwhelmed by a powerful event, here's how I would address it:
1. Transparent decision-making: I would ensure that the decision-making process is transparent, involving experts and stakeholders to assess the risks and benefits of different options. By involving multiple perspectives and sharing the rationale behind the chosen approach, it can help build trust and understanding among the community.
2. Continuous evaluation and adaptation: It is essential to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the levee system. If it becomes apparent that the chosen system is not providing the desired level of protection, adjustments can be made. This could involve retrofitting or upgrading the existing system to better withstand future events.
3. Learning from mistakes: In the event of an unfortunate outcome, it is important to acknowledge any shortcomings and learn from them. Conducting thorough post-event analyses can help identify areas for improvement and inform future decision-making processes.
In summary, prioritizing a very strong and expensive levee system for New Orleans would provide the highest level of protection, save costs in the long run, and address the challenges posed by climate change. To deal with potential backlash, transparency, continuous evaluation, and learning from mistakes are key strategies.
Step-by-step explanation:
<3