Answer:
An advantage of direct democracy over indirect democracy is that it allows for more direct citizen participation and control over decision-making processes. In direct democracy, citizens have the opportunity to directly vote on laws, policies, and other important issues. This means that each individual's voice has an equal opportunity to be heard and influence the outcome.
Direct democracy promotes a sense of empowerment and engagement among citizens, as they have a direct say in shaping the governance of their society. It allows for a more inclusive and representative decision-making process, as it gives all citizens an equal opportunity to participate and have their opinions considered.
One example of direct democracy is a referendum, where citizens directly vote on a specific issue or policy. For instance, in Switzerland, citizens can participate in referendums on a wide range of topics, including constitutional amendments, legislation, and international agreements.
On the other hand, indirect democracy, also known as representative democracy, involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf. While indirect democracy allows for more efficient decision-making, as representatives have the time and expertise to analyze complex issues, it can sometimes result in a disconnect between the government and the governed. This can lead to feelings of disempowerment and frustration among citizens who feel their voices are not being adequately represented.
In summary, an advantage of direct democracy is that it promotes citizen participation and control over decision-making processes. It allows for more direct and inclusive involvement in governance, giving each individual an equal opportunity to have their voice heard and influence the outcome.
Step-by-step explanation: