Answer:
The Counterfeit Goods Act 37 of 1997 does provide a mechanism for intellectual property rights holders to take a number of formal steps to locate and eradicate counterfeit goods. This includes the search of a perpetrator's premises.
Section 20 of the Act states that an inspector may, at any reasonable time, enter any premises and inspect any goods or documents if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that counterfeit goods are being or have been manufactured, stored, possessed, or traded in at those premises.
The inspector must produce his or her identification and a warrant issued by a magistrate before conducting the search. The warrant must specify the premises to be searched and the goods or documents to be inspected.
The inspector may seize any counterfeit goods found during the search. He or she may also seize any documents that are relevant to the investigation.
The search is permissible under the Act and accordingly lawful if the inspector has reasonable grounds to believe that counterfeit goods are being or have been manufactured, stored, possessed, or traded in at the premises. The inspector must also produce his or her identification and a warrant issued by a magistrate before conducting the search.
However, the search must be conducted in a reasonable manner and the inspector must respect the rights of the person whose premises are being searched. The inspector must not seize any goods or documents that are not relevant to the investigation.
If the inspector believes that the search has been conducted unlawfully, the person whose premises have been searched may challenge the search in court.
Step-by-step explanation: