215k views
4 votes
In Texas v. White, the Court had that secession was? (PLEASE HELP)

A) illegal

B) the final act of sovereignty

C) permissible under the partly national/party federal idea

D)allowed only when the other states agree to it

User Domakas
by
4.2k points

2 Answers

3 votes
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
User Antwaun
by
4.1k points
8 votes
Answer: A

Explain: was illegal because the bonds were not signed by the governor, as required by federal law. The defendants contended that, while a state may bring a suit in the Supreme Court, Texas had no such right in this case because it had seceded and, therefore, the federal law was not applicable at the time the bonds were transferred.
User Reality Extractor
by
4.3k points