Question

Some readers argue that Mary is in control.These readers cite her manipulation of the police as evidence.

Answer 1

The question relates to how a character named Mary exhibits control through her interactions with the police in a narrative, an analysis supported by evidence from the text.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question centers around the interpretation of a character's actions in a given narrative. Considering manipulation of the police and control exerted by a character named Mary suggests a focus on literary analysis. It is evident that readers are analyzing Mary's actions as a form of control when she interacts with the police, potentially in a text where she may have manipulated events or information to influence the police's understanding of a situation.

Evidence of control can manifest in different forms, such as how a character in a narrative manipulates the situation or others within it. Insight into Mary's behavior and its effects on those around her could be illustrated through examples like direct dialogue, the outcome of the events, or the reactions of other characters. Additionally, quotations from the text further solidify the analysis by grounding it in the primary source material.

Answer 2

In this combined sentence, the first part states the readers' argument. The phrase "citing her manipulation of the police as evidence" acts as a subordinate clause that explains the basis of their argument. This structure effectively merges the two ideas into one cohesive statement.

To combine the two sentences into one while maintaining their meaning, you can use various techniques like coordination, subordination, or embedding one clause into another. Let's go through these steps to create a unified sentence:

1. Identify the Main Ideas: The first sentence discusses the argument of some readers about Mary's control. The second sentence provides evidence for this argument, specifically her manipulation of the police.

2. Determine the Relationship: The second sentence gives evidence to support the claim made in the first sentence. This relationship is causal: the claim is supported by the evidence.

3. Choose a Method to Combine: Given the causal relationship, we can use a method that shows cause and effect. Subordination is a good choice here.

4. Combine Using Subordination: To do this, make the first sentence the main clause and the second sentence a subordinate clause. The subordinate clause can begin with a word like "because," which shows the reason or cause.

5. Refine for Clarity and Flow: After the initial combination, tweak the sentence for clarity, readability, and to ensure it sounds natural.

Combining the sentences using these steps:

Original Sentences:

• "Some readers argue that Mary is in control."
• "These readers cite her manipulation of the police as evidence."

Combined Sentence:

"Some readers argue that Mary is in control, citing her manipulation of the police as evidence."

The complete question is here:

Some readers argue that Mary is in control. These readers cite her manipulation of the police as evidence. Combine the sentences into one sentence.