Answer:
The separation of Church and State was being infringed upon by the “state” side of that promise.
Explanation: The major argument raised by the Catholic Church and some legislators against the passing of the Rizal Bill was that it was seen as an attack on the Catholic faith and the influence of the Church in the Philippines. The Rizal Bill, also known as House Bill No. 5561, aimed to require the study of the life and works of national hero Jose Rizal in all schools in the Philippines. However, the Catholic Church, being the dominant religion in the country, opposed this bill for several reasons. One of the main concerns raised by the Catholic Church was that the bill could potentially undermine the teachings of the Church and the religious beliefs of its followers. They argued that the study of Rizal's works might promote ideas that were contrary to Catholic doctrine and values. The Church also expressed concerns about the separation of church and state. They believed that the state should not interfere in religious matters or dictate what should be taught in schools. They saw the Rizal Bill as an infringement on their religious freedom and a violation of the principle of separation of church and state. In addition to the Catholic Church, some legislators opposed the Rizal Bill due to similar concerns about religious freedom and the separation of church and state. They argued that the bill could potentially lead to the exclusion of other national heroes or figures from the school curriculum, which they believed should be determined by each school or educational institution.