This debate should be decided on which event had the greatest impact in world history.
The Han Dynasty’s scope is greatly exaggerated. It influenced parts of East Asia, namely China. However, other places had their own great empires at the time, with significant acheivements that are on par with the Han Dynasty. For example, Rome reached its peak during the Han Dynasty’s reign. While the Han Dynasty created an innovative society for itself, the Discovery of the New World took to spreading its innovations and ideals throughout the world, making it more impactful overall.
The USA a direct effect of Europe discovering the new world, has more resources than the Han Dynasty did, and is the most powerful country in the world. The United States has worked around the globe, promotes peace, and engages in various diplomatic, economic, and military efforts to advance its interests and objectives. Meanwhile the Han dynasty was localized in East Asia, playing a smaller role.
Also, the opponents points on Confucianism are exaggerated as well. While confucianism is important, it is mostly localized to East Asia. Meanwhile, Europe discovering the Americas had a huge social impact. And it ended up causing an exchange of cultures, ideas, and knowledge in addition to bringing together otherwise separated cultures. The Silk roads they had don’t stand up in comparison to the great Atlantic trade routes, which helped globailzation at the time.
Furthermore, the Han dynasty severely lacks modern-day influence. Its small scope and tools may have been large contributors to this. Although it may have been influential in modern-day China, it wasn’t the first to unite China and had most of its impacts localized in China. Unlike the Han Dynasty, Europe discovering the new world led to the development of several global superpowers and had a profound impact on the world. It also led to the start of two new eras of globalization and colonization, which eventually led to the largest empire in world history.The USA has more resources than the Han Dynasty and is the most powerful country in the USA. The USA worked around the globe, promoted peace, and continues to play a major role in the world. Meanwhile the Han dynasty was localized in East Asia, playing a smaller role. The Han dynasty is just one empire while the discovery of the new world led to the creation of multiple global superpowers.
My opponents point on the Han Dynasty being a reason for why Europe discovered the Americas are completely false. If the navigational improvements from the Han Dynasty were why Columbus reached the Americas, how come his findings were completely off? What Columbus had done was use mismatching and faulty data in an attempt to find Asia, not America. Attributing the Han Dynasty to Columbus accidentally coming across the Americas is illogical. Additionally, the han dynasty believed the earth was flat.
Finally, Native American deaths are still impactful. We are debating on what is the more impactful event, not the better event. This shows why the native american population is so little today.
How can my opponents say that a dynasty that was localized in East Asia and had little significant modern-day influence is more important than the discovery of an entire subcontinent, ultimately leading to the creation of several global superpowers, and new eras of globalization and colonization. My opponents have no arguments that still stand, which is why I urge you to vote in favor of “Europe discovers the new world.”
I hope this helped!
~~~Harsha~~~