150k views
1 vote
Rowland v. Divall (1923) case summary

User Gfrigon
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

Explanation: In Rowland v. Divall, the plaintiff was a passenger in the defendant's car. The defendant was driving on a narrow road and collided with another vehicle, causing the plaintiff to be injured. The defendant argued that the accident was caused by the plaintiff's own negligence, but the court found that the defendant was responsible for the accident. The court held that the defendant had a duty of care towards the plaintiff as a passenger in his car and that he had breached that duty by driving recklessly. As a result, the defendant was found liable for the plaintiff's injuries and was ordered to pay damages.

User Pratik Prajapati
by
7.5k points