Hi,
-The phrase "Is the fence which was broken and dirty look terrible" is "not a practical phrase" because it is "not a grammatically correct sentence." There are a few issues with this phrase that make it impractical:
- 1. Lack of subject: The sentence does not have a clear subject. It should specify who or what the sentence is referring to. For example, "Does the fence, which was broken and dirty, look terrible?"
- 2. Use of "which": The use of "which" implies that the fence was broken and dirty, and it is now being questioned if it looks terrible. However, this usage is not common in everyday language. It would be more practical to rephrase the sentence as, "Does the broken and dirty fence look terrible?"
- 3. Awkward phrasing: The phrase "broken and dirty look terrible" is not a natural way to express the idea. It would be better to rephrase it as "look terrible because it is broken and dirty."
By rephrasing the sentence, we can make it more clear and grammatically correct: "Does the broken and dirty fence look terrible because of its condition?"
Remember, it's important to use proper grammar and clear phrasing to ensure effective communication.
Let me know if my answer is wrong or not what you were looking for because I would like to help all I can.
If you have any further questions let me know and I may be able to help.
I hope that my answer helped you out. :)