Question

Which piece of evidence offers the best justification for why Bode’s law is considered a mathematical curiosity?

Responses

A. Neptune and Pluto were discovered at distances outside the established pattern.

B. The law describes a pattern, but does not explain why the pattern occurs.

C. The law offers guidelines to predict the location of planets.

D. Ceres is an asteroid, not a planet.

Answer 1

B. The law describes a pattern, but does not explain why the pattern occurs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Bode's Law, also known as the Titius-Bode Law, is a mathematical relationship that attempts to predict the distances of planets from the Sun based on a numerical sequence. While the law was able to accurately predict the approximate distances of some planets in the solar system, it failed to accurately predict the distances of Neptune and Pluto. Additionally, the law lacks a theoretical explanation for why the numerical sequence it is based on should accurately represent the planetary distances. This is why Bode's Law is often considered a mathematical curiosity rather than a fundamental physical principle.