Answer:
c
Both (a) Amend the Articles of Confederation or write a new constitution? and (b) How are the interests of the large states and the small states balanced? are correct.
One of the main debates and questions at the Constitutional Convention held in 1787 was whether to amend the existing Articles of Confederation or create a completely new constitution. Many delegates felt that the Articles of Confederation, which served as the governing document of the United States at that time, were inadequate and needed significant revisions. Others believed that a new constitution should be drafted from scratch to establish a stronger central government.
Additionally, another major issue at the convention was how to balance the interests of the large states and the small states. The delegates grappled with the question of how much representation each state should have in the proposed national government. The larger states argued for representation based on population, while the smaller states feared being dominated by the larger ones and advocated for equal representation for each state.
Ultimately, through compromises such as the Connecticut Compromise (or the Great Compromise), a solution was reached that established a bicameral legislature with equal representation for each state in the Senate (to satisfy the small states) and representation based on population in the House of Representatives (to satisfy the large states).