Answer:
Main idea of the paragraph: The poet must be aware that they will be judged by the standards of the past, but this judgment should not restrict their creativity or make their work conform completely.
Definitions:
- Peculiar: In this context, it means unique or distinct.
- Inevitably: In this context, it means unavoidably or necessarily.
- Canon: In this context, it refers to the accepted principles or rules in a particular field, such as literature or art.
- Infallible: In this context, it means incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
- Conform: In this context, it means to comply or adhere to established standards or expectations.
According to Eliot, a work of art that conforms completely is not really a work of art. The sentence that conveys this information is: "To conform merely would be for the new work not really to conform at all; it would not be new, and would therefore not be a work of art."
According to Eliot, contemporary works of art should not be judged as "better" or "worse" than past ones. The sentence that conveys this information is: "I say judged, not amputated, by them; not judged to be as good as, or worse or better than, the dead; and certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."
Translation of Eliot's paragraph: The poet must understand that their work will inevitably be evaluated based on past standards. However, this evaluation should not restrict or completely conform to those standards. Merely conforming would prevent the new work from being truly innovative and artistic. Instead, the value of the new work lies in its ability to fit in with the past while also displaying individuality. This judgment of conformity and individuality is not an easy task, as we are fallible judges. We can only say that the work appears to conform or appear individual, but it is unlikely to be exclusively one or the other.
Step-by-step explanation: