Question

3. (YOU MUST WRITE NOTES ON THIS QUESTION) "In order to have the continued opportunity to express their ‘generosity,’ the oppressors must perpetuate injustice as well." (Paulo Freire) My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by: a. This is crazy ‘commie’ nonsense from Freire – it’s a disgrace that Unisa allows this rubbish to appear in its official study material. b. This is rubbish - if it were not for the essential goodness of the wealthy, the lives of the poor would be so much worse than they already are. c. So let me get this straight – Freire is saying that in order for some to continue being generous (like Bill Gates), wealth AND poverty need to be sustained? I’m going to have to think about this. d. Freire is absolutely right - all this ‘generosity’ just makes rich people look like the heroes when actually they are the villains. e. How can you possibly say something as ungrateful as option d?

Answer 1

The statement by Paulo Freire suggests that oppressors, in order to maintain the opportunity to appear generous, must perpetuate injustice. This means that those who hold power and resources may use acts of generosity as a way to maintain control and justify the existing unjust systems that benefit them.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's analyze the options:

a. This option dismisses Freire's statement as "crazy 'commie' nonsense." It also criticizes the university for including such material. However, this response does not engage with the content of Freire's statement or provide any reasoning.

b. This option argues that the wealthy are essential for the well-being of the poor. It suggests that the lives of the poor would be even worse without the essential goodness of the wealthy. This response offers a different perspective but does not directly address Freire's statement.

c. This option reflects a confusion or need for further clarification on Freire's statement. It questions whether both wealth and poverty need to be sustained for some individuals to continue being generous. This response shows an effort to understand the statement and prompts further reflection.

d. This option agrees with Freire's statement, characterizing the generosity of the rich as a facade that masks their true role as villains. It suggests that the perception of wealthy individuals as heroes is misleading. This response aligns with Freire's perspective and critiques the notion of generosity.

e. This option questions the gratefulness of option d, suggesting that it is ungrateful to label the rich as villains. However, this response does not engage with the content of Freire's statement or provide any reasoning.

Overall, option c demonstrates a thoughtful approach by seeking clarification and reflecting on Freire's statement. It shows an open-mindedness to consider different perspectives and engage in critical thinking.