24.7k views
4 votes
Help with this mathematics question.thank you​

Help with this mathematics question.thank you​-example-1

1 Answer

2 votes

Explanation:

"without finding equivalent fractions" is very hard, because you do exactly that either directly or indirectly when answering such a question.

a.

5/15, 3/4, 4/5

5/15 is much less than 1/2.

3/4 and 4/5 are both much larger than 1/2.

4/5 is much closer to 1/1 (the whole) than 3/4, as 4 out of 5 parts contains more of the whole than 3 it of 4 parts.

b.

5/11, 2/3, 6/7

like a. : 5/11 is less than 1/2.

2/3 and 6/7 are larger than 1/2.

6/7 is again much closer to 1/1 than 2/3 (6 parts of 7 vs. 2 parts of 3).

c.

3/50, 1/3, 2/5, 5/8, 3/4

3/50 is really small. much smaller than 1/3 and the rest.

for 1/3 to 2/5 we have to use equivalent fractions :

1/3 = 2/6

now 2/6 vs. 2/5 it is clear that 2 larger parts is bigger than 2 smaller parts (1/5 > 1/6).

but they are both smaller than 1/2.

between 5/8 and 3/4 (both larger than 1/2) we need to use again equivalent fractions :

3/4 = 6/8

clearly, 6/8 > 5/8

d.

3/10, 2/5, 4/7, 5/6, 7/8

3/10 and 2/5 are smaller than 1/2.

but between them we need again equivalent fractions :

2/5 = 4/10

clearly 4/10 > 3/10

4/7 is larger than 1/2 but still far from 1/1 (the whole).

5/6 and 7/8 are both closer to 1/1.

but for 5/6 a while 1/6 is still missing, while for 7/8 only a 1/8 is missing.

and because 1/6 > 1/8, 7/8 > 5/6.

User Blackaardvark
by
7.7k points

No related questions found