Ling was a new Christian in Communist China. He began to teach his children the Christian faith which was against the law.
Was Ling right in what he was doing? Why or why not?
This is a difficult question that involves ethical and religious issues. There is no definitive answer, but different perspectives may offer some insights.
From a legal perspective, Ling was breaking the law of Communist China, which prohibits children from converting to Christianity before the age of 18. He could face punishment or persecution from the authorities if he was caught. He could also put his children at risk of discrimination or harassment from their peers or teachers. Therefore, from a legal perspective, Ling was not right in what he was doing.
From a Christian perspective, Ling was following the commandment of Jesus to make disciples of all nations and to teach them everything he had commanded (Matthew 28:19-20). He was also obeying the biblical principle to train up his children in the way they should go (Proverbs 22:6). He was sharing the gospel with his children, which is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes (Romans 1:16). Therefore, from a Christian perspective, Ling was right in what he was doing.
From a personal perspective, Ling had to make a choice between obeying God or obeying man. He had to weigh the benefits and costs of teaching his children the Christian faith. He had to consider his conscience and his convictions. He had to pray for wisdom and guidance from the Holy Spirit. He had to trust God for protection and provision. Therefore, from a personal perspective, Ling’s decision may depend on his faith and circumstances.