The least likely response from Gianna's teacher would be to "assume the missing details." Teachers typically encourage students to provide accurate and complete information in their nonfiction articles. Assuming missing details can lead to inaccuracies or misinformation in the article, which is against nonfiction writing principles.
The other three options are more likely responses a teacher would give to help Gianna with her nonfiction article:
- "Do additional research": This response encourages Gianna to gather more information and facts to improve her article's details and make it more informative and engaging.
- "Practice telling the story to a friend": By practicing storytelling, Gianna can identify areas where the article may lack clarity or where additional details are needed to make the narrative more coherent.
- "Explain the characters better": If Gianna's nonfiction article involves real people or individuals, the teacher might suggest providing more background information or context to make the characters' roles and significance clearer to the readers.
Overall, the least likely response is for the teacher to advise Gianna to "assume the missing details." Instead, the focus would be on ensuring accuracy, clarity, and completeness in the nonfiction article.