Answer:
Healthcare costs in the United States are on the rise. Some people say that a universal healthcare system would bring costs down and increase access to care. According to the World Health Organization, universal health coverage (UHC) means that all people have access to the full range of quality health services they need, when and where they need them, without financial hardship. Proponents of UHC argue that it would reduce healthcare costs by providing preventative care and reducing reliance on expensive hospitals and specialist services.
On the other hand, others say that a universal healthcare system would be too expensive and would reduce the quality of care. They argue that the high cost of providing quality healthcare makes universal healthcare a large expense for governments, and that it would be funded primarily through taxes. Critics also point out that the U.S. system is fundamentally a private healthcare system, not universal, and that implementing UHC would require significant changes to the current system.
In terms of objectivity and evidence, both sides present valid arguments. Proponents of UHC point to successful implementations of universal healthcare systems in countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. Critics, on the other hand, point to the high cost of healthcare in the United States and argue that implementing UHC would be prohibitively expensive. Ultimately, the decision about whether or not to implement a universal healthcare system in the United States will depend on weighing the potential benefits against the potential costs.