206k views
0 votes
One argument offered by Rachels against both metaethical moral relativism and normative moral relativism notes that these views have implications that contradict our ordinary views about morality.

true or false

User Bow
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

True. Rachels argued that both metaethical moral relativism and normative moral relativism contradict our ordinary views about morality, as they imply that there are no universal moral truths, which conflicts with common moral beliefs.

User Ahmed Yousif
by
8.6k points