D. The claims made in an argumentative thesis must be debatable
An argumentative thesis differs from an explanatory thesis primarily in the nature of the claims it presents. The correct option is D because an argumentative thesis takes a stance on a controversial or debatable issue and seeks to persuade the reader to accept that position. It requires presenting evidence and reasoning to support the claim and to counter opposing viewpoints.
On the other hand, an explanatory thesis is focused on providing information and explaining a topic without taking a specific stance or trying to persuade the reader. It aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of a subject by presenting facts, analysis, and possibly interpretations but does not involve attempting to convince the reader of a particular viewpoint.
Let's briefly review the other options to highlight why they are not correct:
A. The claims made in an argumentative thesis may be based on primary or secondary sources, but it is not a defining characteristic of an argumentative thesis.
B. The purpose of an argumentative thesis is actually to persuade the reader, not just to inform. The purpose of an explanatory thesis is more about informing and providing clarity on a subject.
C. The facts presented in an argumentative thesis might be widely known or not, depending on the specific context, but the crucial aspect is that they must be debatable to form the basis of an argument.
~~~Harsha~~~