Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Robbie Case's theory of central conceptual structures differs from Piaget's theory of cognitive development in several ways.
Case sees conceptual structures linked to specific domains. Piaget's theory of cognitive development posits that there are general stages of development that apply across all domains of knowledge. Case, on the other hand, argues that conceptual structures are domain-specific, meaning that they are tailored to specific areas of knowledge, such as arithmetic, social interactions, or spatial reasoning.
Case sees development as following a sequence of steps. Piaget's theory of cognitive development also posits that development follows a sequence of stages. However, Case argues that these stages are not as rigid as Piaget believed. Instead, Case sees development as a more gradual process, with children moving through a series of steps as they acquire new knowledge and skills.
Case emphasizes the role of working memory. Piaget's theory of cognitive development does not explicitly address the role of working memory. Case, on the other hand, argues that working memory plays a critical role in cognitive development. He believes that the capacity of working memory limits the amount of information that children can process at a given time. This, in turn, limits the complexity of the conceptual structures that they can construct.
In addition to these differences, Case's theory also incorporates elements of other theories of cognitive development, such as the information-processing approach. This makes Case's theory more comprehensive and flexible than Piaget's theory.
Here is a table that summarizes the key differences between Case's theory and Piaget's theory:
Aspect Case's theory Piaget's theory
1.Nature of
conceptual structure Domain-specific General
2.Sequence of
development Gradual, with steps Rigid stages
3.Role of
working memory Important Not explicitly addressed
4.Other influences Information-processing approach None