Answer:
Topic: Should college athletes be paid?
Person 1: I don't think college athletes should get paid since they already receive a scholarship that pays for their tuition, room, board, and other expenses for playing their sport.
Person 2: I disagree. College athletes generate millions of dollars for their universities and the NCAA, and they should be allowed to make some money for themselves.
Person 1: But if we pay college athletes, it could make college sports even more competitive and create an unfair advantage among schools.
Person 2: While that's possible, athletes work really hard to play their sport, and the NCAA makes billions of dollars without giving them anything in return.
Person 1: Maybe, but paying college athletes could lead to questions about the amateur status of collegiate athletics. Athletics is a way for students to express themselves and be part of a community, and making a profit off that community can be seen as wrong.
Person 2: I get that, but it also isn't fair for these student-athletes to give so much of their time and energy towards their sport without being able to get paid for their work. It could also help reduce corruption in college sports.
Sources:
Person 1: According to "The Case Against Paying College Athletes" by Robert Maranto in Forbes, "Paying college athletes could create spending contests where schools outbid each other for star players. College sports would become even more competitive and schools with less money would have a hard time keeping up."
Person 2: However, in "College Athletes Should Be Paid" by Khadrice Rollins in Sports Illustrated, the author writes "The National Collegiate Athletic Association takes in roughly $1.05 billion in revenue each year, but athletes who make it all possible are not allowed to get paid. That doesn't seem fair."
Person 1: In another article by Steve Berkowitz in USA Today called "The Case for Not Paying College Athletes", he writes "Pay-for-play could result in a loss of interest among fans and alumni, reducing revenue and undermining non-revenue sports' survival."
Person 2: But in "Why College Athletes Should be Paid" by Ed O'Bannon in Time, the author argues "It's not a negative thing to work hard and earn something that you created. I guarantee every coach in college sports today is making top dollar. The players are the product and they should see some of the profit."
Person 1: I see where you're coming from, but this is still a complicated issue, and there's no easy answer.
Person 2: I agree, and the NCAA should consider student-athletes' needs, fairness, and fair compensation when working on this contentious issue.
Sources:
- "The Case Against Paying College Athletes" by Robert Maranto, Forbes, 2019
- "College Athletes Should Be Paid" by Khadrice Rollins, Sports Illustrated, 2019
- "The Case for Not Paying College Athletes" by Steve Berkowitz, USA Today, 2018
- "Why College Athletes Should be Paid" by Ed O'Bannon, Time, 2019
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope this helps! You can edit it if you like.