Question

1. How do you think Locke would respond to the reliability of this symbolic representation of threats to humanity made by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists? Is it logically reasonable to infer the increase or decrease of threats to humanity based on historical patterns and current events? In defending your response, include a brief explanation of Locke's theory of epistemology with special emphasis on induction and causation. (Hint: you do not need to go as far back in the theory as his concept of the "tabula rasa.") Be sure to explain what induction is and why Locke supports it as a reasonably reliable means of gaining knowledge. (Hint: To answer this question well, you will definitely need to look into the criteria and kind of data are that are used by the members of the the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.) (25 Points)

2. How do you think Hume would respond to the reliability of this symbolic representation of threats to humanity made by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists? Can certain historical patterns and contemporary world events be used to predict the potential for end of civilization? In defending your response, include a brief explanation of Hume's skepticism and why he rejected the principle of induction and the principle of universal causation. (25 Points)
3. With which of these two philosophers do you find yourself most inclined to agree? Briefly defend your answer comparing relative strengths and weaknesses of each theory. (10 Points)

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Critically explain the change in Smith's behaviour.

b) What would you have done if you were his immediate boss?

c) Do you feel that recurrence of such cases can be avoided by improving the motivational climate of the organisation?

d) What steps would you initiate as Chief Executive of the company to solve the problem?