Answer: When a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the majority opinion of the Court, they are dissenting. Dissenting means that they express their disagreement with the decision or reasoning of the majority. This is an important aspect of the judicial process as it allows for different perspectives to be considered and provides a record of alternative viewpoints.
By dissenting, a Supreme Court justice is essentially stating that they disagree with the majority opinion and believe that the decision reached by the Court is incorrect or flawed. They may write a dissenting opinion explaining their reasoning and providing alternative arguments.
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help shape future legal discussions, provide guidance to lower courts, and serve as a record of disagreement within the Court. Dissenting justices may also hope to influence public opinion or future judicial appointments by voicing their dissent.
It is important to note that dissenting justices are not "threatening to resign" or "offering congratulations." Rather, they are exercising their right to express their disagreement and present an alternative viewpoint within the judicial process.
Step-by-step explanation: