Final answer:
The question of Ms. Urbanski's guilt and the validity of her self-defense claim are heavily dependent on the laws of her jurisdiction and the exact circumstances of the incident. Self-defense laws and principles such as 'Castle Doctrine' or 'duty to retreat' will play a critical role in determining the outcome of her trial.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether Ms. Urbanski is guilty of manslaughter and whether it was justified self-defense is largely contingent on the specific laws and facts surrounding the incident. Self-defense laws vary by jurisdiction, but generally require a reasonable belief of imminent harm to oneself or others. The fact that Ms. Urbanski fired at the burglar as he was fleeing may weaken a self-defense argument since the imminent threat may have passed. Additionally, certain jurisdictions have the 'duty to retreat' principle, which requires one to avoid using deadly force if safely retreating is possible. However, some states have adopted 'Castle Doctrine' laws that offer greater protection to individuals defending themselves in their own homes. The specific circumstances and local laws will dictate the legality of Ms. Urbanski's actions.