178k views
3 votes
Which explains the difference between fascism in italy and militarism in japan?

1 Answer

2 votes
Fascism in Italy and militarism in Japan were distinct political ideologies and systems that emerged in the early 20th century. While there may be some similarities between the two, there are also notable differences.

Fascism in Italy, led by Benito Mussolini, emphasized extreme nationalism, authoritarian rule, and the glorification of the state. It sought to establish a dictatorial government where the state had control over all aspects of society, including the economy and individual liberties. Fascism in Italy relied on charismatic leadership, paramilitary organizations like the Blackshirts, and propaganda to enforce its ideologies.

On the other hand, militarism in Japan reflected a different set of circumstances and objectives. It arose primarily due to Japan's desire for expansion and regional dominance during the early 20th century. Japanese militarism was characterized by the increasing influence of the military in political affairs and the pursuit of aggressive foreign policies, including territorial acquisitions in Asia.

While both fascism in Italy and militarism in Japan emphasized strong nationalistic sentiments, militarism in Japan was more focused on territorial expansionism and establishing a sphere of influence in East Asia. Fascism in Italy, on the other hand, was primarily centered on building a totalitarian state and exalting the ideals of the nation.


User Manthan Jamdagni
by
8.1k points

Related questions

asked Aug 16, 2019 106k views
Chad N B asked Aug 16, 2019
by Chad N B
7.9k points
2 answers
5 votes
106k views
2 answers
2 votes
115k views