Answer:Nazario's biography Enrique's Journey and editorial "A Nation of Immigrants" highlight the perils and injustice faced by undocumented migrant children. Yet they differ markedly in their narrative approach, reflecting their distinct aims and intended audiences.
The biography employs an intimate, emotive style grounded in Enrique's subjective experience. Through Enrique's eyes, we see the harsh reality of his perilous journey - the cruelty of coyotes, privation in "stash houses," his longing for his mother (Nazario 8). Nazario's vivid prose elicits our empathy, immersing us in Enrique's suffering to expose the human cost of current policies. This personal lens drives home the biography's key message: each migrant child has a name, a face and a story worth knowing (Nazario 3).
Conversely, the editorial adopts a removed, analytical tone. Lacking named individuals, it presents statistics on child migration, cites experts, and outlines policy shortcomings (Nazario “A Nation”). Nazario's proposals - such as streamlining the asylum process - aim to alleviate a generalized problem rationally, based on efficiency and justice rather than emotion. The editorial's objective lens widens its appeal, addressing lawmakers, policy analysts and other decision-makers.
Both works call for more humane solutions. Yet the biography seeks to Kindling readers' sympathy for migrants as fellow humans, while the editorial argues for inclusive policies based on principled reasoning and America's identity as "a nation of immigrants."
The Power of Nazario's advocacy lies in this duality. By giving a name and story to statistical abstractions, Enrique's Journey personalizes the editorial's policy critique. Conversely, the editorial's rational argument legitimizes the biography's emotional plea, anchoring compassion in reasoned ethics and pragmatic reform. Together, they present a unifying vision of what America should - and could - become.
Step-by-step explanation: