211k views
4 votes
What would be the best approach to develop a research design to address the relationship between diversion programs in public schools and delinquent behaviors resulting in juvenile justice interventions? Discuss and outline each element involved to address the research question.

User Pmarcoen
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

To develop a research design to address the relationship between diversion programs in public schools and delinquent behaviors resulting in juvenile justice interventions, several elements need to be considered. Here is an outline of the key elements involved in addressing the research question:

1. Research Question: Clearly define the research question that examines the relationship between diversion programs in public schools and delinquent behaviors leading to juvenile justice interventions. For example, "What is the impact of diversion programs in public schools on reducing delinquent behaviors and subsequent juvenile justice interventions?"

2. Literature Review: Conduct a thorough review of existing literature to understand previous studies, theories, and concepts related to diversion programs and delinquency. This step will help identify gaps in existing knowledge and guide the development of hypotheses or research objectives.

3. Hypotheses or Research Objectives: Based on the research question and literature review, formulate hypotheses or research objectives that will guide the study. For example, "Hypothesis: Public schools with well-implemented diversion programs will have lower rates of delinquency and subsequent juvenile justice interventions compared to schools without such programs."

4. Sampling Strategy: Determine the target population (e.g., public schools, students, and delinquent behaviors) and select an appropriate sampling technique. Consider factors like representativeness, feasibility, and ethical considerations when determining the sample size and method of selection.

5. Data Collection: Determine the data collection methods that will be used to gather relevant information. This may involve surveys, interviews, observation, or analysis of archival data. Consider using multiple sources of data such as school records, official reports, student self-reports, and administrative databases to ensure comprehensive data collection.

6. Variables and Measures: Identify the key variables to be measured. In this case, variables may include the presence or absence of diversion programs, types of delinquent behaviors, frequency of interventions, and various demographic factors. Develop appropriate measures and scales to quantify these variables accurately.

7. Research Design: Select an appropriate research design, such as a quasi-experimental design with a control group, to examine the relationship between diversion programs and delinquent behaviors. Randomly assign schools to intervention and control groups to minimize bias. Consider incorporating pre- and post-test measurements to assess the effectiveness of the diversion programs.

8. Data Analysis: Choose appropriate statistical techniques that align with the research design to analyze the collected data. This may involve descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, and regression analysis to identify any significant relationships between diversion programs and delinquent behaviors.

9. Ethical Considerations: Ensure ethical guidelines are followed throughout the research process, including obtaining informed consent, protecting participant confidentiality, and considering the potential risks and benefits associated with data collection and dissemination.

10. Limitations and Future Directions: Acknowledge any limitations of the research design and propose future directions for enhancing the study's validity and generalizability.

By considering and outlining these essential elements, you can develop a robust research design to explore the relationship between diversion programs in public schools and delinquent behaviors leading to juvenile justice interventions.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Vinay H
by
8.3k points