Final answer:
ABC Ltd.'s 15% holding in XYZ Ltd. with an unexercised option for an additional 15% does not imply control or significant influence. Therefore, the investment is classified as. An investment, considering ABC's lack of intention and financial ability to exercise the option.
Step-by-step explanation:
When assessing the classification of ABC Ltd.'s investment in XYZ Ltd., we must consider the existing 15% holding and the option to acquire an additional 15% of shares. Given that ABC Ltd. has neither the intention nor the financial ability to exercise the option, and the relationship does not meet the criteria for an associate, subsidiary, or joint arrangement, the investment is best classified as d. An investment.
Companies tend to choose financial capital strategies based on various factors, including the desire to maintain control, the stage of growth, and the need for financial resources. Issuing stock, unlike issuing bonds or borrowing money, does not obligate the company to make payments, although it may dilute control if a significant proportion of the company is sold off.
In the case of ABC Ltd., because there is no significant influence or control over XYZ Ltd. with only a 15% share and no intention to exercise the option to increase that share, ABC Ltd.'s holding is merely an investment rather than an associate, subsidiary, or joint arrangement.