Answer:
hey here's the first one :)
hope you find this useful!
:D
The countercyclicality of international capital flows in the pre-war Gold Standard and the subsequent procyclicality after World War I can be attributed to the characteristics of each period and the economic conditions experienced during those times.
Pre-War Gold Standard:
During the pre-war period, when the Gold Standard was in place, international capital flows exhibited countercyclical behaviour. This means that capital flows tended to move against the prevailing business cycle.
In a countercyclical pattern, capital flowed from countries experiencing economic booms (expansions) to countries facing economic downturns (contractions). This movement of capital was driven by investors seeking opportunities for profitable investments and a desire to diversify their portfolios.
During economic downturns, countries experiencing contractions often faced decreased demand for goods and services, leading to reduced investment opportunities. At the same time, interest rates tended to be higher in these countries as a result of the economic slowdown. As a result, international investors sought to reallocate their capital from these countries to those experiencing economic booms, where investment opportunities were perceived to be more favourable.
The countercyclicality of international capital flows during the pre-war Gold Standard period was facilitated by the fixed exchange rate regime. Under the Gold Standard, participating countries fixed their currencies to a specified amount of gold. This stability in exchange rates, combined with capital mobility, allowed for the movement of capital across countries in response to changing economic conditions.
Post-World War I Procyclicality:
After World War I, the behaviour of international capital flows shifted towards procyclicality. This means that capital flows began to move in the same direction as the prevailing business cycle, amplifying economic booms and contractions.
Several factors contributed to the procyclicality of capital flows during this period:
a. Financial Market Developments: The post-war period witnessed significant advancements in financial markets, including the growth of securities markets and increased availability of credit. These developments facilitated the expansion of international capital flows and increased the speed at which capital could move across borders.
b. Economic and Political Instability: The aftermath of World War I led to economic and political instability in many countries. These uncertain conditions created opportunities for profit as well as increased risks. Investors became more sensitive to the potential for higher returns during economic expansions, leading to a procyclical movement of capital towards countries experiencing economic booms.
c. Exchange Rate Flexibility: The post-war period saw a transition away from the rigid fixed exchange rate regime of the pre-war Gold Standard. Many countries adopted more flexible exchange rate arrangements, allowing their currencies to fluctuate in response to economic conditions. This increased exchange rate flexibility made it easier for capital flows to align with economic cycles.
As a result, during economic expansions, capital tended to flow into countries experiencing booms, attracted by higher returns and expectations of continued growth. Conversely, during economic contractions, capital would flow out of countries facing downturns, exacerbating the economic challenges they were already experiencing.
It's important to note that these patterns of countercyclicality and procyclicality in international capital flows are not absolute and can vary based on specific circumstances, policy responses, and investor behaviour. Nonetheless, the pre-war Gold Standard period was characterized by countercyclical capital flows, while the post-World War I period saw a shift towards procyclicality.