Question

a family was very poor and george who is 15 stole some food so that his 2 year old brother would have somehting to eat. a person who thinks that george should go to jail for this is at what moral development stage

Answer 1

A person who believes George should be jailed for stealing food is at the conventional stage of moral development. This stage focuses on following laws and social rules but may differ between genders according to Gilligan's critique of Kohlberg's theory.

Step-by-step explanation:

The person who thinks that George should go to jail for stealing food to feed his younger brother is likely operating at the conventional stage of moral development, according to Kohlberg's theory. At this stage, individuals see morality as upholding laws and social rules. This is typically developed during the teenage years, when individuals become more aware of society's expectations and focus on maintaining order by following rules.

It's important to note, however, that moral reasoning is not always aligned with moral behavior, and that people can exhibit different levels of moral reasoning in different situations. Carol Gilligan's criticism of Kohlberg's theory also introduces the perspective that men and women might approach moral dilemmas differently, with women potentially emphasizing care and relationships more in their moral considerations.

Answer 2

A person who thinks George should be jailed for stealing food is likely at the conventional stage of Kohlberg's theory of moral development, valuing strict adherence to rules and laws.

Step-by-step explanation:

• The person who believes that George should go to jail for stealing food for his sibling is likely at the conventional stage of moral development, according to Kohlberg's theory.
• At this stage, typically reached by early adolescence, individuals are aware of the importance of rules and laws and often judge the morality of actions based on these established norms.
• They view actions such as stealing as wrong, despite any mitigating circumstances, because these actions break societal rules and laws.

• Carol Gilligan, a critic of Kohlberg's theory, suggests that moral reasoning can differ between genders, with girls and women potentially focusing more on the importance of interpersonal relationships and the context of the action, rather than strictly adhering to rules and laws.
• However, the individual in question is assessing the situation based on the conventional stage of moral reasoning, which values the adherence to laws and societal norms above particular individual circumstances.