Answer: b.
Explanation:
Verdicts reached by a judge versus verdicts reached by a jury differ in several ways.
a. If a judge reaches a guilty verdict, then so does the jury. This statement is not necessarily true. A judge and a jury can reach different verdicts in a case. While it is possible for both the judge and jury to reach the same conclusion, it is not guaranteed.
b. Juries and judges are more likely to agree on a verdict than to disagree. This statement is generally true. Juries and judges tend to agree on verdicts more often than not. However, there are cases where they may have different opinions, and the final decision may rest with the jury.
c. Juries in civil cases overwhelmingly find in the plaintiff's favor more than the defendant's. This statement is incorrect. The outcome of a civil case can vary, and it is not accurate to say that juries overwhelmingly find in the plaintiff's favor. The decision depends on the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by both sides.
d. Juries nearly always give higher awards in a civil case than a judge. This statement is not necessarily true. Juries can award higher damages in certain cases, but it is not a guarantee that they will always give higher awards compared to a judge. The amount of damages awarded can vary depending on the circumstances and evidence presented.
Based on the analysis above, the most accurate statement is: b. Juries and judges are more likely to agree on a verdict than to disagree.