Question

In the China section about China. First, the U.S.-Ukrainian biological laboratory issue is known to the whole world, but he continues to point his finger at China on this issue, saying that China has been threatening the world with biochemical viruses, which is ignoring the facts. Second, draw a line with the pro-democracy activists who are on the same front as you, and say that others have low cognitive abilities. From the perspective of character, this is extremely conceited. Third, some media organizations objected to spreading rumors about China, claiming that they made up random information, which is a slap in the face. So, is Yan Zhihua the enemy? Not sure, because his concepts and logic are confused. In the United States, he also talked a lot. First, in the case of Li Yan, a high-end Chinese financial company, who was shot by the American police, he called the American police a gang of bandits, but the fact is that Li Yan used knives and stabbed the police. Fighting back is normal behaviour. Second, question the freedom of speech in the United States, and accuse the United States of being darker. Third, spread rumors that the World Health Organization, as the world's largest intergovernmental public health organization, has not performed its duties, claiming that it is corrupt and corrupt, and that its personnel spend extravagantly on business trips.

Answer 1

It seems like you are discussing different statements and actions made by Yan Zhihua, specifically regarding certain issues in China and the United States. It's important to note that as a person who's answering this question, I don't have personal opinions or knowledge of specific individuals. However, I can provide some general information and perspectives related to the topics you mentioned.

1. U.S.-Ukrainian biological laboratory: The issue you mentioned might be related to conspiracy theories or controversies surrounding certain laboratories. However, it's crucial to rely on credible sources and scientific evidence when discussing such topics to ensure accurate information.

2. Pro-democracy activists and low cognitive abilities: It is not appropriate to generalize or belittle individuals based on their cognitive abilities. Having differing opinions or beliefs is a natural part of any democratic society, and respectful discussions can help foster better understanding between different perspectives.

3. Media organizations and spreading rumors: Media organizations should strive to uphold journalistic standards and verify information before publishing it. Spreading rumors or false information can undermine public trust and can have serious consequences.

4. Li Yan incident: Without specific details or context, it is difficult to provide a comprehensive analysis of this incident. It is important to rely on reliable sources and consider multiple perspectives when evaluating events and their implications.

5. Freedom of speech and accusations against the United States: Freedom of speech is a fundamental right in many democratic nations, including the United States. However, like any country, the exercise of this right is subject to reasonable limitations to protect public safety and individual rights.

6. World Health Organization (WHO): The role and effectiveness of international organizations such as the WHO can be a topic of discussion and evaluation. It is important to have constructive debates backed by evidence, recognizing that organizations may have their strengths and weaknesses.

Remember, it is crucial to rely on reliable sources, consider different viewpoints, and rely on verifiable information when discussing complex issues.