Suspecting a burglar was attempting to enter his garage, Hakim let his Dobermans outside to take care of the threat. He was shocked six months later when he was served with a lawsuit claiming damages for the serious injuries inflicted by the Dobermans’ bites on the thief’s hands and legs. Why has Hakim been named as a defendant in this lawsuit? Question 5 options: A) The injuries result from his reckless disregard for the trespasser’s presence. B) The thief must be a child in order for injury to a trespass to be actionable. C) Hakim owed a generalized duty of care based on the neighbour principle. D) Hakim owed a duty of care to restrict the number of bites his dogs could inflict.