According to Hollihan and Baaske (2005), interpersonal arguments have at least three objectives: persuasion, conflict resolution, and catharsis.
1. Persuasion: One objective of interpersonal arguments is to persuade the other person to change their beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors. This can be done by presenting logical reasoning, providing evidence, or appealing to emotions.
2. Conflict resolution: Interpersonal arguments can also aim to resolve conflicts by finding a mutually agreeable solution. This involves actively listening to the other person's perspective, seeking common ground, and engaging in a constructive dialogue to reach a resolution.
3. Catharsis: Sometimes, interpersonal arguments serve as a form of emotional release or catharsis. This objective focuses on expressing frustrations, venting emotions, and relieving built-up tension in a controlled and respectful manner.
According to Benoit & Benoit, there are four common strategies for getting out of an argument:
1. Avoidance: This strategy involves actively avoiding or ignoring the argument, either by changing the subject or physically leaving the situation.
2. Acquiescence: In this strategy, one person gives in to the other's viewpoint or requests to end the argument and restore peace.
3. Deflection: Deflection involves redirecting the argument away from the initial issue and focusing on something else, often by using humor or changing the topic.
4. De-escalation: This strategy aims to reduce the intensity of the argument by calming emotions, acknowledging common ground, and finding areas of compromise or agreement.