Question

4. What is the difference between red style and blue style in the conflict resolution? A. Red style has bluffs, ploys and coercion while blue style uses collaboration style. B. Red style view negotiat

Answer 1

The difference between red style and blue style in conflict resolution can be summarized as follows:

A. Red Style:

Red style is characterized by the use of bluffs, ploys, and coercion in conflict resolution.

It often involves aggressive tactics aimed at gaining an advantage or asserting power over the other party.

Red style tends to focus on individual goals and interests rather than seeking collaborative solutions.

It may prioritize winning or dominating the negotiation process.

This style can be confrontational and may involve tactics such as threats or ultimatums.

B. Blue Style:

Blue style, on the other hand, emphasizes collaboration and cooperation in conflict resolution.

It involves seeking win-win solutions that benefit all parties involved.

Blue style emphasizes open communication, active listening, and understanding the underlying interests and needs of each party.

It encourages problem-solving and creative thinking to find mutually beneficial outcomes.

Blue style views negotiation as a joint effort to reach agreements that satisfy all parties' interests.

In summary, red style tends to employ aggressive and confrontational tactics, while blue style promotes collaboration and seeks mutually beneficial solutions. Red style may rely on coercion and manipulation, while blue style emphasizes open communication and problem-solving. The choice of style depends on the nature of the conflict and the goals of the parties involved.