Answer:
To make the argument more convincing, the author could provide the following types of evidence:
1. Statistical data: The author could include statistical data that supports the claims made in the passage. This could involve presenting relevant numbers, percentages, or trends that demonstrate the prevalence or impact of the topic being discussed.
2. Expert opinions: The author could include quotes or references from experts in the field who have conducted research or have extensive knowledge about the topic. Expert opinions can lend credibility and provide a foundation for the arguments presented.
3. Case studies or examples: Including specific case studies or real-life examples can help illustrate the points being made and show how the arguments apply in practical situations. This type of evidence can make the argument more relatable and tangible for the readers.
4. Research findings: The author could reference studies or research conducted by reputable organizations or scholars that support the claims being made. These findings can provide additional support and validation to the arguments presented in the passage.
5. Historical evidence: If relevant, the author could provide historical evidence or references to past events or trends that support the arguments. This can demonstrate continuity or patterns over time and strengthen the credibility of the claims.
Regarding the evidence lacking in the article, the passage itself is not specified, so it is challenging to provide specific examples. However, some potential shortcomings could include:
1. Lack of empirical data: If the passage is based solely on personal opinions or anecdotal evidence without supporting data, it may weaken the argument's persuasiveness. Including concrete data can strengthen the author's position and make it more convincing.
2. Absence of counterarguments: To provide a balanced perspective, it is essential to address potential counterarguments or alternative viewpoints. Without acknowledging opposing viewpoints or potential criticisms, the argument may appear one-sided or incomplete.
3. Limited scope of evidence: If the passage relies heavily on a particular type of evidence (e.g., personal experiences or expert opinions) without incorporating a diverse range of evidence, it may limit the argument's strength. Utilizing a variety of evidence types can enhance the argument's credibility and appeal to different readers.
4. Lack of current or up-to-date information: If the passage does not include recent research, data, or references, it may weaken the argument's relevance and accuracy. Including the most current information available can strengthen the argument and demonstrate its applicability in the present context.
By addressing these potential limitations and incorporating additional types of evidence, the author can enhance the persuasiveness and credibility of their argument.
Step-by-step explanation: