The above move relating to iteration and integration testing is a bad idea because "It reduces the overall predictability established through cadence and synchroniza-tion" (Option C)
Adding a week to integration in the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration disrupts the established rhythm and coordination of the Agile Release Train (ART).
This reduction in predictability can impact the team's ability to consistently deliver the intended solution within the initially planned timeframe.
It's like throwing off the beat in a song; the team works best when everyone is in sync, and changing the timing can lead to uncertainties and potential delays in achieving project goals.
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The Agile Release Train (ART) is near the end of the final Iteration of their first Program Increment. Integration into staging is more challenging than estimated. They add a week to the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration for integration and testing. Why is this a bad idea?
Options:
A.
Overall train velocity goes up and the time-to-market goes down
B.
It substantially decreases the predictability of the Solution Intent
C.
It reduces the overall predictability established through cadence and synchroniza-tion
D.
It decreases job satisfaction by removing autonomy and purpose