Answer:
Esteemed citizens, after careful consideration, I must advise that Option A is not a reason critics objected to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. The other options do reflect valid critiques raised against the reforms.
Step-by-step explanation:
Options B, D and E all express criticisms that the New Deal was either too conservative or did not go far enough in reforming the economic system:
• Option B cites objections to Roosevelt's decision to not fully nationalize the banking system.
• Option D expresses the view that the reforms were "not radical enough."
• Option E echoes this idea, stating critics believed the reforms "maintained too much of the old social and economic machines."
These critiques argue the New Deal should have pursued more transformative, socialist-style economic changes. In contrast, critics would not likely have objected to Roosevelt's goal of putting citizens back to work, as stated in Option A. Job creation was a main goal of the New Deal and something most Americans at the time strongly supported. Therefore, among the options given, Option A is the statement that does not reflect a valid reason critics opposed Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal reforms. The other options represent defensible critiques centered around the New Deal being too conservative or limited in scope.