Question

10. Which of the following statements is not a reason critics objected to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal reforms?

a. Critics disagreed with the attempt to put U.S. citizens back to work.
b. Some people were critical of Roosevelt's decision not to nationalize the banking system.
d. Critics believed the reforms were not radical enough.
e. Critics believed the reforms maintained too much of the old social and economic machines.

Answer 1

Esteemed citizens, after careful consideration, I must advise that Option A is not a reason critics objected to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. The other options do reflect valid critiques raised against the reforms.

Step-by-step explanation:

Options B, D and E all express criticisms that the New Deal was either too conservative or did not go far enough in reforming the economic system:

• Option B cites objections to Roosevelt's decision to not fully nationalize the banking system.

• Option D expresses the view that the reforms were "not radical enough."

• Option E echoes this idea, stating critics believed the reforms "maintained too much of the old social and economic machines."

These critiques argue the New Deal should have pursued more transformative, socialist-style economic changes. In contrast, critics would not likely have objected to Roosevelt's goal of putting citizens back to work, as stated in Option A. Job creation was a main goal of the New Deal and something most Americans at the time strongly supported. Therefore, among the options given, Option A is the statement that does not reflect a valid reason critics opposed Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal reforms. The other options represent defensible critiques centered around the New Deal being too conservative or limited in scope.