Question

Which of the following is an argument a Social Darwinist might make about using government regulations to help the

poor and working classes?
O It is a fundamental function of government to provide a social safety net for those who are less fortunate.
O It should be up to individuals to decide whether or not to help the poor. Government shouldn't legislate it.
It is our duty to help those who cannot help themselves. What the poor need is religion and human dignity, along with some help
from the government.
The government should not directly intervene to help people. Our system relies on competition and allowing only the best of us to
succeed.
NEXT DUSTION
ASK FOR HELP
TURN IT IN

Answer 1

A Social Darwinist is likely to argue that the government should not directly intervene to help the poor and working classes, as they believe in the survival of the fittest and competition as the driving forces of progress. They might argue that government regulations and social welfare programs interfere with the natural order of things and create a culture of dependency and entitlement. Therefore, the argument that a Social Darwinist might make is: "The government should not directly intervene to help people. Our system relies on competition and allowing only the best of us to succeed."