Answer:
The impact of the monopoly power, or market power, of major league teams on the amount of revenue they receive is a matter of academic debate. Some researchers argue that a team's monopoly power does have a significant effect on the amount of revenue it generates, while others suggest that the relationship is not clear-cut. The impact of a team's monopoly power depends on various factors such as the market structure, barriers to entry, and elasticity of demand.
The above-mentioned study on Major League Baseball found that the impact of monopoly power on team owners' revenue was inconsistent. This study found that monopoly power did not enhance the team owners' market power, but could have other unpredictable impacts on team revenues. Other studies suggest that, in the sports industry, league-wide bargaining and collaboration among owners can dilute the monopoly power of any individual team owner.
While it is generally believed that a monopoly has the power to influence prices, in the case of major league sports, this power may be offset by the fact that ticket prices and TV revenues are also influenced by the quality of the team, the popularity of the sport, and other factors. For example, if a team is performing poorly or if there is a lack of interest in a particular sport, the team may not be able to raise its prices despite having a monopoly.
In conclusion, the extent to which the monopoly power of major league teams affects the amount of revenue they generate is a complex issue that depends on several factors. While a team's monopoly power can influence prices, other factors such as the popularity of the sport and the quality of the team can also play a role in determining revenues. The relationship between monopoly power and revenue, therefore, is not always clear-cut.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this helps