Answer:
Sure. Those who would likely have been frustrated or angered by Cicero's essay on the role of the Roman state include:
A Roman soldier who spent years in the military, then returned home to find his family had lost its land to debt. These soldiers fought for Rome, but they were not rewarded for their service. Instead, they returned home to find that their families had lost their land to debt. This was a common occurrence in the Roman Republic, and it led to a great deal of frustration and anger among the soldiers.
Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus. These two brothers were tribunes of the plebs who attempted to reform the Roman Republic. They proposed a number of measures that would have benefited the poor and the middle class, but they were opposed by the wealthy and the powerful. Tiberius was eventually assassinated, and Gaius was forced to flee Rome.
A citizen of the early Roman Republic who owned a small farm and served in the Roman army. These citizens were the backbone of the Roman Republic. They fought for Rome, they paid taxes, and they obeyed the laws. However, they were often exploited by the wealthy and the powerful. They were forced to pay high taxes, and they were often unable to defend themselves against the wealthy landowners.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cicero's essay on the role of the Roman state was a defense of the status quo. He argued that the Roman Republic was a perfect form of government, and he attacked those who would reform it. His essay was met with a great deal of criticism, and it is likely that those who were frustrated or angered by the status quo would have been angered by his essay.