Step-by-step explanation:
In the movie "12 Angry Men," several factors unrelated to the facts of the case influence and affect the outcome of jury deliberations. These factors shape the jurors' attitudes, biases, and decision-making processes. Here are some examples:
1. Personal experiences and prejudices: Jurors bring their own life experiences, beliefs, and prejudices into the deliberation room. These factors can cloud their judgment and affect how they perceive the evidence and the defendant. For instance, Juror #3's strained relationship with his own son influences his initial inclination to convict the defendant.
2. Emotional reactions and biases: Emotions play a significant role in jury deliberations. Personal biases, such as racial, social, or cultural biases, can influence how jurors interpret the evidence. In the movie, Juror #10's racist remarks and biases against the defendant impact his ability to objectively consider the evidence.
3. Group dynamics and social pressure: The dynamics within the jury room can sway individual jurors' opinions. The majority opinion or the influence of dominant personalities can create social pressure on dissenting jurors. In the film, Juror #8 faces resistance from others initially, but his persistence and ability to challenge the groupthink mentality gradually sway the opinions of fellow jurors.
4. Personality clashes and interpersonal conflicts: Conflicts and clashes of personality among jurors can affect the deliberations. Personalities, communication styles, and personal grievances can create tension and hinder productive discussions. Juror #7's impatience and desire to rush the process exemplify how personal dispositions can disrupt the deliberation process.
5. Preconceived notions and first impressions: Jurors often form initial impressions based on the defendant's appearance, background, or alleged crime before the trial even begins. These preconceived notions can be difficult to overcome and may impact how jurors interpret the evidence. Juror #4's initial certainty about the defendant's guilt based on his personal experiences reflects this influence.
6. Peer influence and persuasion: Persuasive arguments and effective communication can shape jurors' opinions. Juror #8's rational and logical arguments gradually influence other jurors to reconsider their initial positions. This demonstrates the power of persuasion and the potential for one individual to sway the collective opinion.
It is important to note that these factors are not exclusive to the movie and can be observed in real-life jury deliberations. They highlight the complexities of the human psyche and the challenges in achieving a fair and objective decision-making process.