Answer: ridge the gap between the premises and the conclusion, and they play a crucial role in determining the validity and persuasiveness of an argument.
An argument that is made up of well-supported premises and logically sound inferences is considered to be a strong and convincing argument. Conversely, an argument that consists of weak or questionable premises, or inferences that don't follow sound reasoning, is likely to be unconvincing and flawed.
It is important to note that an argument does not necessarily have to be true in order to be considered a good argument. Instead, the quality of an argument is determined by the strength of its premises and the soundness of its inferences. When it comes to philosophy, an argument is often defined as a set of statements or premises put forward to support a conclusion. However, it is not enough to simply present a series of statements in order to construct a valid argument. For an argument to be considered sound, it must be composed of two fundamental elements: premises and inferences.
Premises refer to the statements or propositions that serve as the foundation for an argument. These premises are the starting point for any argument and must be based on empirical evidence or logical reasoning. The strength of any argument is heavily dependent on the quality and relevance of its premises. Inferences, on the other hand, are the logical connections or steps that link the premises together in order to arrive at a conclusion. when it comes to philosophy, an argument is made up of two essential elements: premises and inferences. These two elements must work together in a cohesive and logical manner in order to construct an argument that is persuasive, convincing, and ultimately sound.
Explanation: i don't need one and my answer is not complicated