Answer:
The scientific community would most likely choose option B: verify the knowledge through extensive observations and then have a discussion to analyze the findings. In science, it is important to subject new ideas to rigorous testing and scrutiny before they are accepted as true. This process helps to ensure that scientific knowledge is based on reliable evidence and is not influenced by personal biases or preconceived notions. Therefore, if a scientist claims to have discovered a new subatomic particle, the scientific community would typically want to see strong evidence to support this claim before accepting it as true.
Step-by-step explanation: