178k views
4 votes
After extensive hearings concerning abuses of senior citizens by the companies providing

supplemental health insurance policies to Medicare patients, Congress passed a federal statute
that contained a provision which prohibited health insurance providers from taking “unfair
advantage” of Medicare patients. Concerned that the federal statute might be struck down by a
court as being unconstitutionally vague, Congress urged the Association of Retired Persons
(ARP) to bring a challenge against Congress to test the constitutionality of the federal statute in
federal court. If the ARP brings an action in federal district court against Congress to test the
constitutionality of the statute , will the federal court hear the case?

User Mcw
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

No, the federal court is unlikely to hear the case if the Association of Retired Persons (ARP) brings an action against Congress to test the constitutionality of the statute. The concept of "standing" is an essential requirement for a case to be heard in federal court. To establish standing, the plaintiff must demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury that is directly caused by the defendant's actions and that can be redressed by a favourable court decision.

In this scenario, the ARP, as an organization, would face difficulties in establishing standing. They need to show that they have suffered a specific injury as a result of the federal statute in question. The fact that Congress urged the ARP to challenge the statute does not necessarily provide the organization with a direct and personal injury. Additionally, challenging the constitutionality of a federal statute passed by Congress can be complicated due to the principles of separation of powers and the political question doctrine, which limit the judiciary's involvement in certain matters that are deemed to be within the realm of Congress.

Therefore, it is unlikely that the federal court would hear the case unless the ARP can establish a direct and tangible injury resulting from the statute, which is difficult in this particular scenario.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Miquel Adell
by
8.1k points