Answer:
There is no "which of the following" but I can answer to the best of my abilities.
There are a few conceivable outcomes in a scenario in which detectives are attempting to ascertain which twin committed a crime and forensic scientists are analyzing papers and handwriting samples:
1. Handwriting analysis leads to a conclusive identification: If the handwriting samples recovered from the crime scene match the handwriting of one of the twins, it can provide solid evidence pointing to the guilty sibling. This outcome would provide clarity and aid in the identification of the responsible party.
2. Inadequate evidence for identification: Handwriting analysis may not produce definitive results, especially if the twins' handwriting is highly similar or there is insufficient distinguishing evidence to establish a conclusion. In such circumstances, detectives may need to gather more evidence to prove either twin's culpability.
3. Other evidence leads to identification: Handwriting analysis alone may not be enough to determine guilt. DNA evidence, security footage, witness testimony, or fingerprints could all be used to determine the perpetrator's identity. The presence and strength of other evidence would determine the outcome.
Ultimately, the outcome will be determined by the facts of the case, the evidence available, and the skill of the forensic scientists and investigators involved.
Step-by-step explanation: