151k views
2 votes
What do you think about "The English Industrial Revolution was

not just one, but a group of three interrelated? revolutions."

User Zimmer
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

I think that the idea that the English Industrial Revolution was not just a single, isolated event, but rather a group of interrelated revolutions is a widely accepted concept among historians. The term "Industrial Revolution" typically refers to the period of rapid industrialization and technological advancements that occurred in England during the late 18th and early 19th centuries, but this process was not a single, homogeneous event. Instead, it was characterized by a series of interrelated revolutions that occurred in different sectors of the economy and society, including the textile industry, transportation, and agriculture.

The first industrial revolution, which began in the mid-18th century, was marked by innovations in the textile industry, including the development of new spinning machines and power looms. The second industrial revolution, which began in the mid-19th century, was characterized by advances in transportation and communication technology, such as the steam engine and the telegraph. The third industrial revolution, which began in the mid-20th century, was marked by the development of new technologies such as computers, the internet, and automation.

Therefore, it can be argued that the English Industrial Revolution was not a single, isolated event, but rather a series of interrelated revolutions that occurred over several centuries.

User MayurCM
by
8.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.